I just got my bill for my daily newspaper, and it seems they removed the discount for which I bargained with them last fall. They did say that it was a six-month deal, but I was hoping they’d forget. They charge $215 a month now for home delivery, which I find to be insane. When I started with the paper, it was about $35. I’ve got to call into the circulation department tomorrow and get my “haggle” on.
I swear, if it wasn’t for the comics and puzzles, I’d
chuck it all. I get my significant news online, so I don’t really need that. The
paper does keep me up on what’s going on locally, though, and lets me keep
track on how the rich are attacking city and state government (both of which
are run by the Dems). And due to a press time of around 6-7 PM, most important stories are a day late. Forget about sports game coverage, it’s
always from two days prior. Their hockey coverage is abysmal. Last week, they
used the previous day’s game results grid, so even two days later,
there was still no information.
The problems started when the paper, the Baltimore Sun,
was bought by the owner of the conservative news outlet, Sinclair Broadcasting.
Now, instead of a reliable stable of in-house reporters, most news articles are
farmed out to Sinclair national desks, and often run transcripts of what their
Fox “News” affiliates ran on-air.
The old paper definitely had a liberal leaning, reflecting the prevailing views of Marylanders, but they kept it to the Op-Ed pages. The current version splashes its bias across every page, and it is especially obvious if you know how to spot it. Here’s one from last Friday:
With all the ways TFG, his family, and minions have been skimming money from the Federal till, they’re still carrying on about Hunter freakin’ Biden. They rarely even mention all the ways the president is raking in illegal dollars from overseas governments and influencers, let alone outright theft from other countries.
Also note that it comes down to “the whistleblowers say they’ve been vindicated.” Right. Trump said he was vindicated by the Mueller Report, too, remember? (Obviously, TFG doesn’t really
remember it that way or he’d have provided a more gracious condolence than he
did.) Nowhere else in the article does it say that anyone in authority has “vindicated”
anyone. This is a nothing-burger article, meant to reflect negative attention
onto Democrats at a time when the president is swimming in bad news and
controversy.
They’ve been working hard at that, as evidenced by this article:
My take is that they got some bad polling news, showing
that people were unhappy with Republicans on the war, the Epstein Files, the
price of gas and groceries, the tanking stock market, etc. But the Sinclair National
Desk couldn’t just run the story; they had to drag the Dems along, too. So the
article is more about the classic “Dems in disarray” story than about how
people are souring on Republicans. And notice how at the end, they talk about “threats
against lawmakers and their families,” but they don’t mention where 99% of
those threats come from.
Here’s another assassination by headline regarding the funding of the DHS:
They make it plain that those Commie Democrats are
holding up funding for the DHS, but never mention that they’ve introduced seven
(as of now) bills to pay the TSA agents and all department workers except for
ICE, which they will pay if they agree to obey the same laws that local police
do. Republicans voted no and killed the bill every time. They’d rather continue
the illegal war on brown people than pay workers whose job actions are
perfectly above board and not in question, essentially holding them hostage
until ICE gets to keep free rein to kidnap anyone with an accent and send them
off to detention camps unknown. Also note that female minors in custody are
coming up pregnant, which they were not before entering custody. Perhaps this
is another reason Republicans are fighting birthright citizenship.
None of that is in the article, just the skewed look at
Dems holding up the works and Republicans excoriating them for it, taken from
interviews that ran on Hannity.
Adding to their penchant for guiding readers to conclusions while omitting essential facts, we have this one from last month:
Yes, those stupid, socialist, Democrat, commie, liberals
want ID from people just to shovel snow! Haw
haw haw, they’re so dum!
But one simple line nullifies the whole perception.
The snow shoveling
was a paying job with the city. Therefore, if people want to be paid, they must
provide documentation! Do you remember all the documentation Republicans insist
we provide to prospective employers, to show we’re not illegal aliens? That’s
what they’re ridiculing. In actuality, the whole snow shoveling thing worked
like a charm. The sidewalks and streets were cleared in a day, and people got
paid for doing it. Running an article like this goes against every journalistic
principle. It does, though, fit right in with being a shill.
And speaking of unforgivable newspaper sins, wouldn’t you think the paper might have kept an editor or two? JFC, how incompetent does one have to be to include a typo in a headline? Doesn’t anyone over there read?
Lastly, and this has nothing to do with the fast-fading newspaper industry, have you seen the design for the new 250-Year Anniversary coin, bearing the stern visage of our malevolent president?
Anyone alive and going to the movies in the early 80s remembers this famous pose. I think somebody owes Steve McCroskey a percentage.
Looks like he picked the wrong week to quit smokin’.





$215 per month is insane. That's a major expense. Surely there must be another source of comics and puzzles, and a city the size of Baltimore surely has several online news sites that would give you a variety of viewpoints instead of just one. I had no idea physical newspapers cost so much these days.
ReplyDeletePlease tell me you canceled
ReplyDeleteLord have Mercy $215 a Month for Newspaper Delivery is Insane... but then again, I remember when my Cox Cable/Internet/Landline Phone Bill was only $8 a Month for the bundle. *Bwahahahahahaha*
ReplyDeleteInfidel,
ReplyDeleteThe whole print industry is dying and I think they're trying to stay financially solvent by squeezing ME.
It's weird that my addiction to the puzzles is what's mostly keeping me as a customer, but getting a paper is really an ingrained habit. My parents always got a daily paper or two, so I grew up with it. I had my own delivered for my entire adult life, save for the 4 years I spent in a particular apartment complex who didn't allow indoor deliver (mid to late 80s).
I've tried doing crosswords online but I just don't like it. And printing them from online would also cost me a fortune (in paper and ink). I like the daily routine of doing my puzzles during lunch, (away from my computer desk) or weekend breakfasts. Sweetpea and I both do them. I do the Baltimore Sun puzzle (which is actually the syndicated LA Times puzzle), the NY Times, the Jumble and the Sudoku.
I've been doing the puzzles at lunch continuously since 2010, and even started a results tracking sheet in 2016. (Looking for longest streaks and such.)
Someone got me a crossword puzzle book once about 10-12 years ago, and I couldn't use it. It was a book of NY Times puzzles but they were from the early 1970s. I couldn't complete a single one... it was like they were from another planet.
So yeah, I'm kind of in a squeeze here. My best bet is to call and try to haggle them into another price break. I'm optimistic because they're like the cable company... they don't want you to walk away so they're willing to make a deal to keep you in the fold. I plan to call them later today. I suppose I could be calling right now but I hate making calls like this so I invariably piddle away the time until I decide to do it tomorrow. Can't do that today though... the bill is due now.
Bohemian, what were you, Customer Number 1? I've never seen a bundle of anything that low.
ReplyDeleteI made a big bundling jump when I moved in with Sweetpea, and got cable, phone, and internet for about $299. (That included HBO, Showtime, and the local sports packages.) Over time, it's creeped up to about $360. At least they provide me with free Netflix and Peacock.
But that's the story with everything, isn't it? Prices go up and rarely come down.*
*Other than new tech, which decreases as it ages, until something new comes along.
That's about $60 more than I pay for a year of The Guardian online. Oy!
ReplyDeleteAnon (1) I didn't cancel. I called this afternoon, and after fighting through a VM system that definitely did NOT want anyone speaking to a human, I got my discount reinstated to $159/month. That works out to $5.12 per paper, as opposed to $6.80, undiscounted, which is still crazy but less insane. (Cover price is $4.00... I remember paying anywhere from a quarter to a dollar on the street downtown, on days my paper wasn't delivered before I left for work.)
ReplyDeleteI expect I'll have to do this every six months from now on until I die or tell them to screw it and go to weekends only.
Anon (2) This certainly puts online subscription prices in perspective. Sounds like a bargain in this day and age, and you get unbiased reporting.