Be on the lookout for a coordinated effort by the GOP to
enhance their voter suppression efforts. It’s already starting, judging by how
many memes like this I’ve been seeing on Facebook. They’re getting the message
out to their minions early.
I beg to differ but there are plenty of reasons to be
against demanding voter ID.
·
There has never been a statistically significant
finding of voter fraud that could have been averted by voter ID. And this is
with a Republican-run Justice Dept. out there specifically looking for it,
mainly from Democrats. They found nothing
(other than random Republican malfeasance, but charging Republicans wasn’t in
their charter).
And not for nothing, stealing
votes by impersonating voters one by one, in person, is the most inefficient
and ineffective way to do it. It just doesn’t happen.
·
The existing voter ID laws are specifically
constructed to reduce Democratic voter turnout. The Supreme Court case that
ruled against North Carolina showed there was significant, compelling evidence
that State Republicans were writing their requirements “with surgical precision” so to prevent as
many African-Americans (seen as likely Democratic voters) as possible. They had
direct physical evidence that demonstrated how they did it. It was not remotely
ambiguous.
Other states use the same or
similar criteria to write their voter ID laws; they just haven’t had the bad
luck to have their written deliberations aired in public. (In the NC case, the
daughter of the guy who designed the bill found and released her father’s
emails, which showed how they researched minority voting patterns and what
kinds of ID they most often carried.)
And note: The Supreme Court only
scrapped the NC law due to a 4-4 tie, which by default, upheld the lower court’s
decision. That will not happen again with the current SCOTUS. With the
Wisconsin decision, the Roberts Court announced that they are now on board with
voter suppression by any means necessary.
·
Republican-run states who demand voter ID are
simultaneously closing MVA stations in areas that serve likely Democratic
voters. They demand the ID and then make it much harder and more expensive to
obtain one. That’s not an accident, that’s a design feature.
They’re also closing voting
stations in the same areas, thus intentionally creating lines of prohibitive
nature. They WANT it to take up hours to vote, hoping that many will skip out.
(And then, in the truly devious part, they purge voter rolls of people who
haven’t voted recently.)
What this shows is a pattern of pursuing voter
disenfranchisement. It’s laughable to claim that it’s only to deter voter
fraud and that all the known “side effects” that prevent US citizens from
voting are just a big coincidence. I’d have more respect for them if they just
came out and admitted it. LIKE TRUMP DID TWO WEEKS AGO!
Just kidding, I still don’t have any respect for him. But
he did say this out loud: “They had
levels of voting that if you ever agreed to it you’d never have a Republican
elected in this country again.” He’s talking about mail-in ballots, with
which all their hard-earned voter suppression would be circumvented. That’s not
a matter of fraud, it’s a matter of not having a platform that the majority of
Americans will support.
Trump said the quiet part out loud: if everyone votes, we
never win again. And for once, he’s right. That’s the reason for the voter ID
laws and closing voting and MVA locations, fighting early voting and on-site
registration, clearing voter rolls of hundreds of thousands of names with
minimal verification or confirmation, and appointing judges who will bless it
all in court.
It’s all about winning the next election. Preventing “voter
fraud,” something that has never swung an election in modern history, is
nothing but an elaborate and wholly ineffective fig leaf.
The real threats to voting integrity come from hacking
and electronic voting machines that lack a paper trail. Voter IDs do not
address any of this.
You don’t see Republicans out there trying to sell people
on what they actually plan to do. It’s
easier to keep people from voting than to convince them that cutting Social
Security and privatizing the post office is a good idea. Or that 1% of the
people should get 98% of the tax breaks. Or eliminating the effectiveness of
the EPA, FEMA, the CDC, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. That’s
stuff they have or are still trying to do.
This is how the political arena is supposed to work.
There are two (or more) sides and one giant population. Both sides
should try to convince the masses why their ideas are better. Those who are the
most convincing, as evidenced by the votes of the people, get to govern.
Period. But we’ve strayed far from that ideal.
The right (not privilege) to vote is essential to being
an American. Republicans, who fight so hard to make the Second Amendment
absolute in ways it was never meant to be, abdicate their righteousness when
they fail to defend the principle of one person, one vote.
Unless it’s one of their
persons, of course. In that case, the more the better.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Agree? Disagree? Tell me what you think!
Note: Spam comments will never EVER see the light of day. Don't even bother because I'm way more stubborn than you.