I still can’t get over how Muslims were moving over to voting Republican. This is even though TFG’s first move last time was to ban all immigration from Muslim countries. Well, except from Saudi Arabia. Even though they provided 19 of 20 9/11 attackers, he thought he could get a tower with his name on it built there. Money always wins out over prejudice with these guys.
Anyway, I was watching some more of those 90-Day shows
last night when it all suddenly made sense.
Back in September, I wrote about getting hooked into the 90-Day Fiancé world. I
even mentioned one storyline where a 41-year-old American woman was going to
Jordan to marry her 22-year-old beau, who immediately began putting
restrictions on her dress and behavior. (And somehow, despite the existence of
the internet, she never saw coming.)
I’d only seen the first installment of their story when I
wrote the post, but it’s continuing as one could foresee. The guy’s demands generate all kinds of conflict, while this woman who is old enough to be his
mama is expected to do as he tells her and stop questioning him about it.
I told Sweetpea last night that they need to let me write
her a speech to deliver. Something like, “Listen
Anand, I was a 19-year-old woman on
the day you were delivered screaming in your diapers and knew more about the
world outside your insular little bubble than you’ll ever know. You did NOT
gain superior wisdom by the mere happenstance of being born with a dick. Now
treat me like a grown-ass modern woman or you can take that dick and find someone
else for it to disappoint.”
Yes, I know she’s never say that, because she’s got “feelings” and shit about the guy, but I
can dream.
There’s another storyline where a woman went to see her
Arab boyfriend in South Africa for the first time but was so nervous about
flying she brought her ex-boyfriend with her, which was an unbelievably stupid
idea, guaranteed to cause a major fight. And it did, leading to the boyfriend
storming off, shouting profanities, and wanting nothing further to do with her.
As it usually goes, they coaxed him back to talk with her, and they ironed out that little wrinkle with a heart-to-heart talk. But last night, she got to meet his friends, who immediately called her out for having bare arms and midriff and tattoos. They told her she’d be expected to become Muslim to continue to date the guy, which was not something that had previously been discussed.
They always wait until they feel the woman is hooked before
telling her about their primitive expectations.
So, now looping back to the election...
Last night it all made sense. This is why the Muslim vote
is migrating to the Republicans. They’re not just a “socially conservative”
society, but one that would gravitate to the kind of medieval society Republican
bible-thumpers are pushing. They want women on their backs and failing that, in
the kitchen. They want them docile, obedient, pliant, and unquestioning, like a
pet retriever. One who lives to serve the man. They certainly weren’t going to
vote for one for president.
I’m sure they also like the persecution of gays,
heretics, and liberals as well; anything that cements the notion of male
superiority. However, they probably underestimate the degree to which they will
never fit in with the MAGAs. Even if they agree with all the policy points,
they’ll never be anything more to MAGA than another raghead to deport.
“Thanks for the vote, though!”
2 comments:
This has long seemed obvious to me (my academic background is in Middle Eastern history and I've studied the Islamic religion extensively). Hard-line religious extremists share similar views on most social issues; whether they're Christian or Muslim is a detail that's usually not very important in practice. I've been saying for years that the hard-line Muslims in Europe are Europe's equivalent of our Christian Right / Dominionist element -- they are Europe's true "far right", and it's absurd that the left defends them and makes excuses for them. Marrying a believing Muslim risks the same kind of problems as marrying a Christian fundamentalist.
It does raise another question, though. Should liberals really be defending further immigration of this kind of problem into the US?
As a grandchild and great-grandchild of immigrants, I don't like the notion of banning people from admission based on ethnicity or country of origin. And it has to be that... banning a religious background is too easy to fake.
"Are you Muslim?"
"Oh no, I'm Christian. Allah be, I mean, God be praised!"
I think in the long run, America will rub off more than they'll rub off on America. The direct immigrants will keep the old ways but their kids will adapt. At least they will if they want to be with a local woman. Plus their native misogyny won't be buttressed across the culture and media. (At least before last Tuesday)
Post a Comment