I was watching TV last night and honestly, the political ads
were stacked up 6-deep, both for and against each issue. And I say “issue” because in Maryland,
that’s where all the money is this year.
That Obama and all the Democratic congressmen and senators will win here
is a given. But the four referendum
issues are bringing the real heat. I've written about these before… aside from immigration and
redistricting questions, the big-money issues are expanded gambling and
same-sex marriage. The local TV
stations are getting rich off all the gambling money alone, as competing casino
interests try to out-bullshit each other.
I think the presidential campaign began immediately after
the 2008 election, when Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell declared that
the Republican’s primary concern was to prevent Obama from getting
re-elected. And that’s exactly how they've operated ever since. No matter
what the President proposed, they were against it. It didn't matter if it was something they've always been for; if
Obama wanted it, they felt obligated to prevent it from happening. Period.
Throughout this year, I've laid out my reasoning for voting
Democratic. I meant to touch on a lot
more areas than I have… you know how it is with blogging… sometimes you get
distracted by the ‘shiny thing.’ But in
addition to my on-going free-floating hostility towards the puckered bungs of
conservative upper crust, I expanded on four specific reasons why I (and
everybody should) vote Democratic.
1) Republicans are only interested in feeding
government dollars to Big Business.
I call it their “Prime Directive,” which states that they want the
freedom to do as they please, we peasants be damned, in pursuit of bolstering
Big Business’s bottom line profits.
That’s why they are perfectly willing to let our economy spiral down the
tubes, in order to play a game of high-stakes “chicken” over allowing a single
dollar of additional taxes to be levied on their corporate benefactors. They are against anything that may benefit
the vast majority of Americans, if it costs money.
2) Republicans are climate change deniers,
for the reason stated above. To do
anything about it would cost money from the businesses that pollute. So to continue to insulate the business
class, they are forced to deny the OVERWHELMING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, in
addition to obvious anecdotal observations, that serious things are wrong with
the world’s ecosystems.
3) Republicans are on the wrong side of
social progress and are in fact, trying to roll back our hard-won social
advances in favor of some kind of memory of past “good old days,” which really weren't all that good at all, unless you were a straight, Christian, middle to
upper class, white male. For a group
that cries about limited government, they sure don’t mind the government taking
over people’s most personal decisions.
The government is supposed keep from enacting regulations that keep
business from bilking customers and taxpayers, but they ARE supposed to tell a
woman that she is required to carry a pregnancy to term?
Just look at the headlines throughout the year. The amount of presumptuousness and just
plain misinformation is staggering.
Women’s bodies automatically shutting down reproduction after a
(“legitimate”) rape? No such thing as a
woman’s life or health being put in jeopardy due to pregnancy? Who are these “gray-faced men,” as
Tina Fey called them, to stick their collective noses into something in
which they obviously have no expertise?
Also in this category is the maintained opposition to
same-sex marriage. Again, they say that
the government shouldn't try to enforce pollution standards on businesses, but
they should prevent two consenting adults from getting married. Listen, you’re either for limited
government, or not. I hate the
hypocrisy there. The Republicans love
to talk about American “exceptionalism,” while having zero trust in Americans
to run their own lives. And by cherry
picking Bible quotations, they just go to show that they know as much about
what Jesus would do, as they do about reproductive science.
4) The Republicans engage in aggressive
dishonesty, misdirection and hypocrisy. They will go out on the campaign trail and knowingly tell blatant,
obvious and irrefutable lies. And they
do not care because they know it works.
Just look at why it’s “common knowledge” that Obama lost the first
debate. They know that Americans would
rather have a candidate that lies smoothly than tell the truth awkwardly. They are masters at condemning in Democrats,
for things Republicans have done for years.
Look at the whole Libyan Embassy thing.
It’s only a major campaign story because it’s Obama.
They talk endlessly about how Obama destroyed the economy,
yet the numbers show the opposite. The
Republicans know this. They just don’t
care, and it’s intellectually dishonest.
Of course, if they were to tell the truth, they’d have to
say, “Obama didn't fix all the problems our policies caused fast enough, so
vote for us so we can put those policies back in place.” When complaining about how Obama isn’t
moving fast enough, they never mention that they've opposed, condemned, delayed
or voted down every single proposal to help the economy that he’s made. No wonder they have to lie and
misdirect. It’s a lot easier than
admitting that they have a platform that’s destructive to 99% of the
people.
Those are the things I've already written about, but there
were a couple more that I never got to:
* The Supreme Court
Odds are high that a new Supreme Court justice will be
needed. Now more than ever, we need a
Democrat in the White House (along with a Senate majority). I think Ruth Bader Ginsberg and/or Stephen Breyer
are likely to retire this term, so replacing these “liberals” with other liberals
will only be holding serve. If a
Republican goes in and a conservative justice is appointed, say goodbye to Roe
v Wade, Affirmative Action, and overturning the Defense of Marriage Act or
Citizens United. And say hello to even
more findings for the rich and powerful, over the interests of the common man.
Now if Anthony Kennedy retires, we’ll have a chance to “take
back” the Supreme Court from the moneyed clutches in which it currently
rests. Unfortunately, I don’t think the
other conservative justices are going anywhere for a while. Alito and Roberts are both young. Thomas is in good shape, and I don’t think
Scalia will leave until they carry him out on his robe.
* Voting Rights
The Republicans’ thinly veiled attempts to suppress
Democratic voting, under the guise of preventing “voter fraud,” goes against
everything for which this country is supposed to stand. George W. Bush’s own justice department
found scant evidence of voter fraud after a 5-year investigation. But Republican governors across the country
have acted in the following ways to attempt to keep prospective Democrats from
voting:
- Purging voter rolls, affecting immigrants, especially Hispanics.
- Enacting documentation barriers and red tape, affecting students, the elderly and immigrants.
- Eliminating or cutting back on early voting, affecting hourly workers and the elderly.
- Under-staffing and under-serving inner city polling places, ensuring long lines to discourage African-Americans and Hispanics from voting.
In every case, the state government is Republican run and
the effects target traditional Democratic voters. There is no conceivable way that it is a coincidence, nor do the
facts show any meaningful voter fraud across the country. It is merely the Republicans, using
Stalin-esque tactics, to stack the deck in their own favor, all the while
promoting the American values and freedom.
It’s sickening.
So, to summarize, the
Democrats try to ensure the financial industry doesn't tank the country again,
the Republicans are against that because regulations limit profits.
The Democrats are trying to
enforce environment regulations to keep industry from poisoning the planet
around us. The Republicans think that’s
a problem because cleaning toxic industrial output costs money.
The Democrats put two
justices on the bench in the last 3 years, who had long histories of service to
the average American. The previous
Republican added two shills for big business who have found for the powerful
over the powerless at every turn. (Up
until Roberts upheld ObamaCare, I should say.
Republicans want to make sure that never happens again.)
The Democrats are in favor
of birth control being widely available and of a woman’s right to choose
whether she should bear children. The
Republicans are against that, substituting the judgment of others over yours.
The Democrats are in favor
of gay marriage as a civil right, because we should not discriminate on account
of the way someone was born. The
Republicans are not because it’s icky and the Bible says so.
The Democrats are in favor
of quick voter registration and easy exercise of the right to vote for all
Americans. The Republicans are not
because they know that there are more likely-Democrats than likely-Republicans,
so the fewer that vote, the better for them.
Regardless of what I may
think of the President’s effectiveness, or that of the other Democratic
congressmen and women, the choices in 2012 are stark. Now is not the time to sit on the sidelines or be apathetic. We have to vote for what we believe.
If you are a big business
executive, a high-income earner, were born into money, or if you are an
evangelical Christian that wants the government to adhere to your church’s
rules, then you should vote Republican.
They will represent your interests well.
I am none of those things,
so I am voting Democratic. So should
you.
8 comments:
"Wealth serves its own," your Dad wrote in a recent letter to the editor here in the Florida panhandle where Romney-Ryan rules. One dollar, one vote replaces one person, one vote.
Republican policies threaten our economy,our democracy, our future and that of our children. They corrupt our sense of who we are as Americans.
Ameica is no longer the land of opportunity for many unless their parents are rich. Trickle down economics fails most Americans. Markets are NOT self-regulating and efficient without government intervention. The rich are NOT job creators. They make money by downsizing, restructuring and moving jobs overseas,
Middle class properity drives our economy. Econmic inequality damages America more than any terrorist bomb, embassy attack or monster storm.
President Obama's education policies, tax proposals, jobs and investment programs work for us, the middle class, the nation's backbone. Let's vote to straighten and strengthen that backbone. .
If someone else had written that, I'd have said something like, "fuckin' A, Sister." But in this case, I'll just say, "Thanks, Mom"
Good job, I took the liberty to pass this blog entry along to some friends and foes of Barack. Dad
Thanks. I'll be on the lookout for hate mail. But it will be worth it if it changes even one mind, or moves someone off the fence.
Right on, Bluz! You've just summed up every argument I've *tried* to have with Repubs I know. Nice job. A few of my favorite notes:
"The Republicans love to talk about American “exceptionalism,” while having zero trust in Americans to run their own lives."
It's scary that so many blindly follow this line of thinking without realizing it's directed at THEM. Your leaders don't trust YOU to live your life. Shouldn't that disturb them?
"When complaining about how Obama isn’t moving fast enough, they never mention that they've opposed, condemned, delayed or voted down every single proposal to help the economy that he’s made."
I think this point is the most underreported of the entire campaign season. What the hell? Why aren't the Dem pundits screaming about it and showing tons of charts showing how many bills the Repubs have shot down?? How many JOB CREATING bills, btw. And, the flip side, how many ridiculously unnecessary or big-government-in-your-bedroom-and-doctor's-office bills they have or have TRIED to put through? I mean, seriously, did we really need our body of Congress to vote on keeping "In God We Trust" in the books? And, the number of abortion-related and marriage-defining attempts is just insane.
I also really liked a point your Mom made above:
"The rich are NOT job creators. They make money by downsizing, restructuring and moving jobs overseas."
The hubs and I have both lived this reality. It's all about "doing more with less" and "reducing costs," NOT quality of life and good working environment. The higher-ups couldn't give a damn how secure the lowly worker feels about his job longevity. If his job can be done (on the books, not in reality) by another guy who's already doing 4 jobs, slash away. So scary how misconstrued these messages are.
Really awesome post, Bluz. Hope you don't mind if I share. :)
Glad to hear from you, Cristy! I thought this one might draw you in...
Your second point is one I've been screaming about for months. That should have been a Democratic answer at every debate, each time a candidate complained about a lack of progress on the economy. You can't swim the English Channel with a cinder block tied to your ankle. The congressional Republicans are that cinder block. The Democrats aren't making that point loudly enough.
"Job Creators" is just a verbal sleight of hand, because they can't refer to their "real" constituents as "the filthy rich business owners." Using a term like "job creators" is just an layer of insulation, because who can attack someone that provides jobs? The problem is that business taxes are at the lowest point ever in the country right now, and have been for 10 years. So where are the jobs? How much lower do they need to go before "job creators" will grace us with some jobs?
Yes, please pass this on. I, and liberals like me, will take all the help we can get.
Yes.
But what struck me most about this post is how Photoshopped Tina Fey is.
Woman power!
I will tolerate no shots at Tina Fey, who is perfect to me in every way, photoshopped or not. Her only fault is marrying some other schmo before she had the chance to meet ME. Why couldn't I be the schmo?
Post a Comment