I very much enjoyed the first January 6th hearing last week. In fact, upon finishing the first session, I said it looks like this was going to be the hot TV mini-series of the summer. It wasn’t until today that I realized that the rest were going to be on during the day. WTH? Don’t they know that some of us have jobs? I guess I’ll have to DVR them, to savor later.
A lot has been made over the claim that a number of
Congressmen sought pardons from TFG, to shield them from any charges stemming
from their roles in the attempted coup. What cracked me up is that they didn’t
get them. They forgot that loyalty is a one-way street with their dear leader.
Once they served their purpose, he had no further need for them. Why would he
care if they got jammed up? Not his problem. Haven’t they been paying
attention? Suckers…
I also had to laugh about the Fox “News” commercial-free
counterprogramming. It’s telling that they’d rather pass up the ad fees from
their highest-rated programs than risk any of their flock wandering over to a
real news channel and hearing some damning information. And after seeing the
messages from their golden boy Hannity, imploring TFG to stop with the stolen
election nonsense, it makes sense. All those middle-aged, angry, white, male,
heads exploding across the country would have been quite a disturbance.
But really, I don’t know what they’re worried about. It’s
not like their audience would believe anything counter to the approved
storyline. Any semblance of critical thinking has already been bludgeoned out
of them.
I know the conservative counter-argument wants to paint
the whole thing as old news masquerading as an electioneering ploy. Nothing
like the 11 Benghazi investigations, I’m sure, which were completely non-political. Please. Tell them this is 1 down, 10 more
to go.
I say if the Democrats can profit off this at the ballot
box, more power to them. Republicans have been doing this shit for years. Did
you see in today’s hearing, when they talked about how much fundraising TFG did
based on the Big Lie? It could be argued that pushing that false narrative was
worth it to the GOP for the financial windfall alone. They hammered their
people with the direst of messaging, each email coming with an outstretched
hand. And we all remember how they pre-checked the tiny box authorizing a
monthly, rather than 1-time, donation, to the chagrin of all those saps who
gave until it hurt.
But the bottom line is that when a group tries to
overthrow the government, there HAVE to be consequences. And not just to the
foot soldiers, but to the “generals” who whipped the whole thing up and worked
overtime to mentally anesthetize their fans into action. (No pardons there
either! Sorry about that, “Proud” boys.)
If the hammer does not come down on the “brain trust” and
all the president’s men, we’re openly inviting another coup. And the
Republicans will have had four years to learn from their mistakes. Like next
time, don’t let the DC police have clubs or defensive gear either; make them
wear their civvies and use Silly String. Or maybe not have any DC police out
there at all; just bring in some cub scout packs or a mime troupe or something.)
And no videographers! The biggest problem these perps had
is that the whole nation watched what happened, live on TV. They could claim it
was a tourist event all they wanted, but we saw what they did with our own
eyes. If they’re smart, they’ll take out all news and surveillance cameras as a
first action.
But who am I kidding? They’ll probably just live-stream
themselves again.
I just hope the Justice Department is following the
proceedings. Without their action, all this high drama becomes nothing but a
sideshow.
In Other News
Shocking as it may be, there just might be hope for a bit
of gun legislation. Word is that there are 10 Senators who will vote for this
bipartisan bill that contains some minor tweaks to our gun laws. I think if
they’re serious, they better find two more because if we learned anything, it’s
that we can’t count on the two senatorial DINOs, Manchin and Sinema.
On one hand, the bill is so thin and “pie in the sky,” I’m
sure there will be people on the Left who will want to vote it down because it
doesn’t carry much weight. That would be a mistake. Even though it doesn’t go
far enough, it’s something and in a fight like this, something is better than
nothing. We just have to go back and try to build on it.
On the other hand, it smacks of the kind of bill the
Republicans can point to and say, “See? We
did something. Now let’s stop talking about the slaughter of innocents so we
can get back to blaming Biden for the price of gas.” Republicans should be
able to get behind this bill because it provides the illusion of action while
not doing a thing to hamper the sale of more guns.
And while it will only take 10-12 of them to get it
passed, watch how they all take credit
for “taking action.” Of course they will. Just like when they took credit, back
in their districts, for things provided by the big Infrastructure Bill that
they voted against.
I was hoping they would at least propose raising the
purchase age from 18 to 21. That shouldn’t have been a tough sell when you
look at the situation dispassionately. This
group is rife with ego, testosterone, lust, and very little impulse control. We don’t
sell beer to that age group because it’s dangerous. But semi-automatic rifles
are OK? It boggles the mind.
The gun people counter with the fact that 18-year-olds
can serve in the military and shoot similar rifles. Granted, they overlook the
part where the military personnel are highly trained and supervised and the
guns are meticulously handled and stored. If that were true with the general
population of gun-buying 18-21-year-olds, I wouldn’t have as much of a problem.
But there are zero prerequisites for buying an AR-15 aside from being able to
slap the money (or Visa) on the counter.
But in the end, I’m sure the real reason a new age limit
wasn’t established was that they didn’t want to shut off such a lucrative
market. Nothing gets in the way of a profitable next quarter, whether it’s
guns, gas, or drugs.
(Late edit: They're already moving the goalposts and trying to find ways to kill the deal)
It’s a Jurassic
World and We’re Just Living in it
I saw Jurassic World-Dominion over the weekend. I love
the franchise and couldn’t wait to see this one in the theater. It’s the first
movie I’ve gone to since March of 2020. (I saw the Harley Quinn movie “Birds of
Prey.”) I was worried because the critics were pretty harsh to it and I really
wanted to enjoy it. I needn’t have worried.
I loved it. And if you’ve enjoyed the previous movies, go
see this one. While there are some talky parts, overall it’s one incredible, scary
set-piece after another. I saw it in 3D and definitely flinched a couple of
times.
They keep comparing it to the original and noting how it pales in comparison. But of course it does! When the original JP came out, no one had ever seen such lifelike representations of dinosaurs before. Those of us who used to think that Land of the Lost was the coolest thing ever got our minds blown. Every JP movie after that lacks that amazement factor, so it's an unnecessarily harsh standard to hold for a new installment. As an audience, we've become blase regarding movie effects. What once was unbelievable has become commonplace.
So sod what the critics think. We don’t go to the Jurassic
movies looking for another Godfather 2. It’s a popcorn movie and a good one. The
Bluzdude approves.
Another Dad Story
Well, kind of. As
I mentioned last week, this will be my first Father’s Day without my Father. I’m
fortunate that I’ll get to celebrate the day with Sweetpea’s family. Her dad is
still alive and well, and all her brothers are fathers, so it will be a nice
communal event.
It reminds me of a Father’s Day present I got my dad ages
ago. I saw this ad in a magazine and thought it represented the perfect
sentiment for my own father-son relationship. I carefully cut it out and
brought it down to the frame store in the mall I worked in, and voila, instant
present. This is the ad:
In case you can’t read the inscription, it says, “As long as there’s an occasion to thank your
father for tolerating your childhood… There will always be a Chivas Regal.”
We were more Jack Daniels drinkers than Chivas, but it
was what it was. I just loved the picture.
So when we cleaned out their place when Mom moved out, I
made sure I ended up with it.
I may not have kids, but I remember being that cub.
Happy Father’s Day (in a week) to all the “Big Daddies” among us.
5 comments:
We all went to see Jurassic World Dominion too and concur with your critique, Loved it... fail to see why any Critic would give it a bad review... while raving about some real loser flicks that have a lot of hype they don't deliver upon? As for the Hearings, unless Criminal Charges are filed, it's just a sideshow really IMO, we all really already know what's up... well, except for the Cult Members who still Believe every Lie shoveled and bought into the Big Rip Off that played them for Rubes and exploited their Fears and Prejudices. Well, tho' it was a big Racketeering Operation I can hardly feel sorry for people giving to a consummate Conman who has been one since the 1970's and I thought everyone on the Planet already knew this Fact... guess there is a Sucker born every Minute and can't wait to be part of some Shitshow...
I laughed when I heard about TFG's email campaign fleecing his flock. Serves them right for sucking up to a con man. But it just goes to show the regard in which he holds his base... they're nothing but suckers to be relieved of their money like he's just another carnival barker.
Brilliant finish, dear Bluz. When I think about your final Chivas Regal picture, it depicts all immature fools who represent the Fox News gang who want to damage the Lion of the Republic.
That grandiose notion doesn’t change the picture’s charm and humor.
I dvr'd Berstein and Woodard on Colbert last night. They did some fabulous side-by-side comparisons with Nixon and trumpie. Wow. They also had some great stories re: Watergate, Katherine Graham, and Martha Mitchell. I have been watching Gaslit, which is superbly acted by Sean Penn and Julia Roberts as John and Martha Mitchel. Oh, the whole gang is here, Halderman, Dean. If you can watch this I really think you'd enjoy the hell out of it. At the time of Watergate I was 17 and in all honesty I did not pay as much attention as I should have, more focus on a nickel bag and if that boy really liked me. Shallow wench that I was. :-)
In other news my dad was a bourbon and beer guy - I think those are boiler makers. He loved his Jim Beam. :-) It will forever remind me of my dad, well and cigars!
Peg,
I turned 13 a couple months after Nixon resigned. I followed along with what was going on but wasn't really up on all the daily revelations. It was important to my parents, so I paid attention as well as a 12-year-old could do.
I got much more interested a few years later when the books started coming out. I read All the President's Men as a teenager (and saw the movie), and then John Dean's book. The whole thing whetted my appetite for politics, the effects of which you read before you today.
I should have got in on Gaslit earlier on. I need to see if I can get it "on demand." In the meantime, we've been watching "The First Lady" on Showtime, which has been brilliant.
Post a Comment