As we sit on the precipice of 2026, we need to keep in
mind that many of the sources from which we get our news are hand-forming the
information to fit the mold they want (or are told) to present. We can see the
obvious ones, like the mess that has become CBS, killing a damning report on ICE
deportations to torture prisons. But many others are much more subtle and are
only revealed through questioning.
Take this article from yesterday’s Baltimore Sun:
Right off the bat, they use a Fox “News” ask/answer setup
in the headline. Also note that the byline is from someone at the Sinclair
National Desk. The primary owner of the conservative Sinclair media network
bought The Sun last year and has given it an obvious Republican bent.
Rather than addressing the legality of these strikes,
they’re playing up the recruitment potential. Doesn’t that say a lot about
those recruits for whom this is enticing? Yay, they get to make things go “boom,”
just like in their video games.
From the article: “Some
experts say the missions showcase a clear purpose, limited scope, and decisive
action-qualities that they believe resonate with young Americans considering
military service.” “Some experts?” Who, I wonder. They answer in the next
line:
“According to Dan
Green, research fellow at the Heritage Institute…” Say no more. They get a
hack from the right-wing Heritage Foundation, backer/creator of Republican
policies and talking points, to shill for the Administration.
Later, they refer to unclear stats to bolster the claim. “(all
branches) have reported meeting or
exceeding their recruiting goals.” What were the goals? Where was the bend
in recruiting numbers? And more importantly, might the goals have been lowered?
That’s the easiest way to make your numbers in a tough environment… lower the
bar. They want you to assume a level playing field, but when has this Administration
ever used a deck they hadn‘t stacked? Without the numbers, their claim of
bolstered recruitment due to these war games is meaningless.
And if it was
effective, look who they’re getting… dudes who want to sit in a basement and
blow shit up from afar. I think they’d better lower their physical and mental
standards if they want any of these schmucks to make it out of basic training.
The Heritage “expert” goes on to rattle off a list of
Republican talking points as reasons prior recruitment was low: mandatory COVID
vaccines, DEI initiatives, and the botched (Trump-designed) withdrawal from
Afghanistan. All of these “issues” are highly debatable as to being a drag on
recruitment, but they’re listed as unchallenged proof in the article.
If this is what mainstream media now offers for basic
news coverage, we will need to be especially vigilant in how we interpret what
we read.
I’m fortunate that in college, I learned a great deal
about the business of media and how to spot the biases within. Future
generations may not have that opportunity, and conservatives are working to make
it that way, with their ongoing war on education:
Corporations aren’t bankrolling political campaigns for the
public’s benefit, only their own. We need to stay vigilant for this grift and
demand government serve its original master: its citizens.
Here’s to having a Happy New Year, with hopes for a better 2026. Who knows, maybe You Know Who will choke on a steak and be toes-up in the Capitol atrium by 2027. Although I wouldn’t put it past Vance, Miller, and the rest of the posse of imbeciles to pull a Weekend at Trump’s, using AI to keep up the public illusion that their orange idol still has a pulse. But even that would be an improvement.

No comments:
Post a Comment