The letter writer believed that these transparent attempts
at disqualifying Democratic voters were actually valid, because someone found a
couple of dead people and pets (dead and otherwise) that were registered to
vote.
He also claimed that asking for an ID is no big deal because
sometimes retail stores ask for IDs when you charge a purchase. You can read the full letter, here.
After the smoke cleared from around my ears, I submitted the
following letter to the paper:
Leonard Pitts was spot on, in his column about how people
are silently standing by while thousands of voters are being purged from the
voter rolls by Republican administrations, under the guise of ferreting out
voter fraud.
Letters like the one headlined “Voter ID no threat to black
civil rights, July 17,” demonstrate how twisted the logic becomes, to justify
this blatant attempt at voter suppression.
As has been widely reported, Justice Department
investigations prompted by the Bush Administration turned up scant evidence of
voter fraud influencing any national elections. Yet we are to believe that the goal of purging a handful of names
from voting rolls should take precedence over erecting barriers that keep
thousands of poor, elderly, or young voters from exercising their
Constitutional right to vote?
Is purging voter rolls in Florida really more important than
the resulting consequence, where thousands of valid, legal registrations were
wiped out of the system without verification that they were indeed
non-citizens? And we’re to think that
it’s all just a big coincidence that these registrations overwhelmingly came
from people that traditionally vote Democratic? Please…
Another red herring is the bit about being asked for an ID
at the store. When shopping, if you
don’t like the policy, you can shop somewhere else. There’s only one time and place to vote in a given election. To interfere with that right is to go
against a fundamental principle for which this country stands.
Apologists also love to bring up the Miami mayoral election
of 1997, which was nullified due to rampant voter fraud. What they don’t mention is that the fraud in
that case was due to the mass filing of absentee ballots. Obviously, none of the Voter ID bills affect
absentee ballots, which makes the “Miami” argument nothing but a red herring.
Obviously, ineligible voters should be removed from voter
rolls, but it should be done in a careful, systematic way and carefully
verified. It should NOT be done in an
election year rush, in a partisan attempt to influence the outcome. As for requiring voter IDs, Mr. Pitts is
right, that it’s nothing but a sledgehammer solution to a mosquito-like
problem.
Bluzdude
Sez Me, Maryland
Because I was trying to keep it short, I didn’t mention how
easy it is for others to sit back on their big, fat, white, asses and decide
what extra steps that other people
should take, in order to exercise the same privileges that they have.
“Sure, you people
without cars, or who are too old to drive any more… all YOU have to do is catch a ride
or take the bus down to the DMV and stand around on your bad knees for a
couple of hours, shuffle some papers, pay your fees, and get your new State
ID. Meanwhile if I have to wait for a cashier to change her register tape, I’ll lose
my shit on her and puff like Rush Limbaugh walking a flight of stairs.”
I probably should have cut the bit on the Miami election,
but I already saw someone mentioning it in the comments online, defending that
letter. People love to grab at that one
exception to “prove” that the thousands of other instances are invalid.
I also wanted to really nail down how obvious this whole
thing is, this effort to suppress Democratic voting, and highlight the
consequent twisted logic that conservatives are forced to adopt (in public) in
order to justify the practice. It amazes
me how easily it happens though… If Fox says it enough times, the sheep believe
it.
I’ll let you know if my little rant gets any traction.
Oh, and the Baltimore Sun is a pay-site now… no pay, no
commenting. I couldn’t even submit my
letter online; I had to email it. But
at least you can still view for free.
In other news, just to end on a lighter note, I saw an article online about how authorities
found a couple of bodies that had washed up from the Detroit River. The heads, hands and feet had been cut off.
If this happened in Arizona, people would be screaming about
Mexican drug violence. Who are they
going to blame for this one? The
Canadians? Right, like there’s a gang
of plaid-shirted lumberjacks running amok.
He’s OK.
Actually, this tragedy was probably home grown, right there
in Detroit. I wonder how much it would
take to pay Canada to take Detroit off our hands…
If only I could learn to make such powerful points in
so few paragraphs.
Even Later Update: You can see Misty's post about our lunch, described in my previous post, by clicking here.
Late Update:
They haven’t run my letter online yet, but they did run one from someone else that takes issue with
the original offending letter.
Even Later Update: You can see Misty's post about our lunch, described in my previous post, by clicking here.































