Couple of things to talk about today…
Syria Killer
To bomb, or not to bomb, that is the question. Or, take the Russian option. A lot has happened on the Syrian front in
the last day or so.
There’s been a whole lot of talk about the Syrian mess over
the last month. Up until now, I've tried to stay out of it, mostly because I’m of two minds.
On one hand, I’m as sick of war as the next guy (who’s not a
defense contractor). Neither side of
this conflict is worth supporting. On
one hand, you have a ruthless dictator bent on maintaining a hold on power, and isn't above using chemical warfare on his own people to do it.
On the other side, you have the (mostly) Muslim rebels
trying to overthrow him. Trouble is, if
they acquire power, we’ll have one more
country that hates us. Al Qaeda is
already arming these rebels and will find an instant foothold if an overthrow
is accomplished.
So it’s been a quandary.
But here’s where I come down…
After witnessing the horrific results of using chemical
weapons, almost every country around the globe signed a treaty banning
such. Syria’s Assad broke that treaty,
to devastating effect on its citizens.
There has to be consequences to that action, or it becomes a green light
for every other despot who’s desperately clinging to power, to gas his
opponents as well. You think Iran’s not
watching this scenario intently?
While it would be all well and good for the UN to step in
here, Russia’s and China’s Security Council vetoes guarantee that it will
not. And our past misdirection
regarding the need for the Iraq War has ruined credibility with most of the
rest of the nations that might have otherwise helped us. We’re the only ones left.
We’re the ones in the role of Global Policeman and this
activity is happening on our watch. We
have to do something. As much as we might wish it, we can’t pull
our heads into our collective shells and pretend that foreign affairs are of no
concern to us. The global theater doesn't work that way.
I think sending a few missiles at Syrian military targets is
the least we can do. With this action,
I’m assuming the President keeps his word that there will be no American forces
on the ground. That would change my
thinking considerably.
I actually like that President Obama went to Congress for
approval. At minimum, it’s a savvy
political move. The Republicans are
usually the war hawks, loving nothing better than using a war effort to funnel
taxpayer money into the coffers of their Halliburton-style puppet masters. However this would require them to publicly
agree to something Obama wants, and that’s something to which they have become
almost genetically opposed to doing.
If Obama gets approval, the GOP can’t complain about bombing
Syria. (OK, they will, but they’ll look
like dipshits.) If they don’t approve,
they have to explain why Syria is different than Iraq, or Libya, or any other
country we've bombed in the last 20 years.
So far, they seem to be trying to find a way to promote intervention,
without actually approving the resolution.
However, all of this may become moot. Due to a new variable where based on an
off-hand remark by Secretary of State Kerry, the Russians offered to
“encourage” Syria to surrender their remaining chemical weapons into a
UN-monitored stockpile. Syria has
stated that they would agree to this, even though to this point they have
denied owning any.
Personally, I could live with that, providing, as John McCain pointed out, we have UN
oversight and a firm time table. That
means no obfuscation or playing for time.
If they don’t give up the goods, ALL the goods, the bombs are in the
air. I would also add that if we find
so much as a fever blister on another Syrian, the next missile lands on the
presidential palace.
If it works, the Russian Plan solves everyone’s
problems. No war, plus no more chemical
attacks in Syria. The Republicans still
get to accuse Obama of letting Putin play the hero, but it’s not like they wouldn't find something to criticize in any scenario. And of course Assad is free to kill the rest of his opponents
with conventional weapons.
I’d just hate to be one of the President’s speechwriters
today. They probably had a finished
draft of tonight’s address to the nation, right up until the John Kerry and the
Russians flipped the table. Oh well…
Sam Seaborne and Will Bailey always got it done on “The West Wing.”
Subway Hate Revisited
I thought of another person I hate on the subway. Here’s his letter.
To: Lazy Dude in the Aisle Seat Who Won’t Stand Up and Let
me Out From the Window Seat
From: The Guy Who Has to Squeeze By Your Big Ass Just to Get
Into the Aisle
Look, I've had a hard day too. If I wanted to climb over things, I’d be out on a jungle gym
somewhere. So when you see that I need
to get out, don’t just swivel your knees around, stand the fuck up, move into the aisle and take
a step back. It’s not hard… in fact I
do it every single time, when I’m in
your position. The only conclusion I
can draw is that you like having my ass in your face as I try to maneuver
myself past your shoulders, elbows and backpack. Enjoy my back pocket, Assface.
Better hope I didn't have the burrito special for lunch.
I’ll Have the Fish…
Get a load of the Pacific Halibut this guy caught, off the
coast of Alaska. As I looked at it, I
could only think of one thing:
"BLASPHEMY!" (Source) |
The fisherman turned down the offer of a voucher for another
day’s charter, in order to keep his 231-pound catch. I think he’s “gonna need a bigger bun”. (Sorry about mixing movie references there.)
I wonder if there were any consequences from the
environmentalists…
6 comments:
"Lalalalala," she says with her fingers in her ears.
I'm doing everything I can to avoid the Syria issue. Is that wrong? Yes. But I can't help thinking it's a lose-lose situation, making me feel ambivalent and helpless.
I do like halibut though. So, thanks for that.
It HAS been a lose/lose situation, that's why I've kept my big yap shut about it for the last month.
And who wouldn't like a good halibut? I sure do, and that's no fluke.
Always a pleasure to hear your thoughts on whatever political maneuvering is going on at the moment. Whether I agree with you or not, I always find you well-reasoned, which is more than I can say for . . . um . . . nearly everyone else?
Halibut was the first fish I ever ordered for myself when I was forced to start eating seafood if I wanted to be taken to nice restaurants by my last boyfriend, so I have a special place in my heart for it, and DUDE. I want that stuffed and on my wall and in my belly.
Thank you for recognizing my attempts to be reasonable. I always say I have reasons for everything I do. They may be stupid reasons, but they’re mine none the less.
I love eating fish, but I don’t think I’ve had halibut. I bet that one would definitely hang over the bun. I had no idea they got so big. Biggest ones I’ve ever seen were, like, dinner plate sized, which I supposed is very convenient.
Syria is a cluster fuck. As others have said, it's a problem without a solution. Just failed attempts, which we are prone to do.
As the President talked, he kept talking about all those kids gassed. I thought of all the other massacres in other countries in which we have done nothing. Also, the hundred thousand people (many of them children) who have died in the civil war there before the chemical attack. Apparently we are super offended by the weapon used, not the killing.
Point of order for future dictators: If you're going to kill hundreds of thousands of your own people, JUST DON'T USE GAS!!
Lesson learned.
No question... there are no good solutions out there.
I don't know what it is about gas... maybe it's just residual fallout from World War I battlefields and World War II in the prison camps. Everyone banded together to ban it and that's been the standard.
Can't say that it makes a lot of sense any more. Maybe it's a business decision, made to appease the bomb makers.
Post a Comment